ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Thursday annulled its 2022 verdict on the interpretation of Article 63(A) of the Constitution, which barred lawmakers from going against party directions when voting in parliament.
Hearing the Supreme Court Bar Association’s (SCBA) plea, the five-member bench led by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa announced the unanimous verdict and approved the review petition.
The case revolves around the apex court’s previous ruling, which stated that the votes of parliamentarians who deviated from their party’s directives and policies were to be disregarded and not counted.
Today’s judgment comes as the coalition government is attempting to pass constitutional amendments, which have been deemed controversial by the opposition.
Defection clause issue
The issue at hand owes its origins to a reference filed by the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government in the SC back in 2022, seeking the apex court’s opinion on Article 63(A) to curbing the menace of defections, purification of the electoral process, and democratic accountability.
The court, via a 3-2 judgement, had then announced the verdict against defections and barred lawmakers from going against their party’s policy lines when voting in the parliament.
Three judges — then-CJP Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Ijazul Ahsan, and Justice Munib — had voted in favour whereas Justice Mandokhail and Justice Mazhar disagreed with the verdict.
The SCBA then filed a plea moving the apex court to take back its opinion on the verdict’s paragraph about not counting the votes of dissidents by reviewing the interpretation made on May 17, 2022.
It maintained that the dissidents should only be de-seated but their votes are supposed to be counted as per the Constitution of Pakistan.
“The apex court’s opinion about not counting the dissident’s votes is against the Constitution and equal to interference in it,” the SCBA stated in the plea.
Why is Article 63(A) important?
Article 63(A) of the Constitution of Pakistan deals with the defection of parliamentarians.
According to the article, a lawmaker can be disqualified on the grounds of defection if they vote or abstain from voting in the House contrary to any direction issued by the parliamentary party to which they belong.
- However, this is restricted to three instances where they have to follow the party’s directions:
- Election of the prime minister or chief minister;
- Vote of confidence or a vote of no-confidence;
- Money bill or a Constitution (amendment) bill.
Per the article, the head of the party is required to present a written declaration that the MNA concerned has defected.
However, prior to presenting the declaration, the head of the party will have to give the MNA concerned a chance to explain the reasons for defection.
Following that, the party chief will then forward the written declaration to the speaker, who would, in turn, hand it over to the chief election commissioner (CEC).
The CEC will have 30 days at their disposal to confirm the declaration. Once confirmed, the MNA concerned will no longer be a member of the House and their “seat shall become vacant”.
This is a developing story and is being updated with more details.
